#OBVIOUS TROLL IS OBVIOUS MANUAL#
#OBVIOUS TROLL IS OBVIOUS LICENSE#

The archetypal example of trolling is the deliberately inflammatory edit or post - saying something controversial specifically to cause a flame war. An important part of the definition of 'trolling' is that it is always something someone else is doing. It does not follow from this that all, most, or any given person engaged in these behaviors is a troll. Remember and apply the principles laid out at w:Wikipedia:Don't bite the newcomers.ДЄll of these identify behaviors that some trolls engage in. It is better to humor a troll for too long than to drive away a sincere but misguided user. Even in that case, it is likely better to remain silent and let others conclude the obvious instead of calling someone a troll and creating even more mayhem. Do not conclude they are a troll until they have shown complete inability or unwillingness to listen to reason or to moderate their position based upon the input of others.

#OBVIOUS TROLL IS OBVIOUS MANUAL#

Explain errors politely and reasonably point them towards policies, the manual of style and relevant past discussions. When you try to decide if someone is a troll, strive to assume they are not. This fact should always be kept in mind when one is tempted to label someone a troll. Such a judgment can never be made with anything approaching certainty. This requires a judgment of the personal motivation for another's action. They are only trolling when they are motivated by a program of malice rather than ignorance or bias. By themselves, misguided nominations, votes, and proposed policy are not trolling. Biased editing, even if defended aggressively, is in itself not trolling.

Trolling is a deliberate, bad faith attempt to disrupt the editing of Wikipedia. There is no enforcement against trolls on most Wikipedia projects, as it is impossible to comprehensively define all behaviors that could be considered trolling. What follows are some comments that point generally in the direction of what a troll is and what trolls do. The nature of trolls is to slip from any definition intended to constrain their actions and to find new and innovative ways to annoy. The basic mindset of a troll is that they are far more interested in how others react to their edits than in the usual concerns of Wikipedians: accuracy, veracity, comprehensiveness, and overall quality. Reversion warriors, POV warriors, cranks, impolite users, and vocal critics of Wikipedia structures and processes are not necessarily trolls. There are many types of disruptive users that are not trolls. Trolling is not exclusive to Wikipedia, as it is a behavior that manifests in many online venues. A troll deliberately exploits tendencies of human nature or of an online community to upset people. A vandal may just enjoy defacing a webpage, insulting random users, or spreading some personal views inappropriately. Trolling is not necessarily the same as vandalism, although vandalism may be used by trolls. Trolls in the Internet sense of the word are not to be confused with large warty monsters thought to dwell under bridges, in caves, etc. Because of this, it is considered not to be any more useful than the judgment 'I don't agree with you' by many users, who prefer to focus on behaviors instead of on presumed intent. The label necessarily involves a value judgment made by one user about the value of another's contribution. Trolling is a violation of the implicit rules of Internet social spaces and is often done to inflame or invite conflict.

#OBVIOUS TROLL IS OBVIOUS LICENSE#

share alike вЂ“ If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.Д¬reative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.Trolling is any deliberate and intentional attempt to disrupt the reliability of Wikipedia for its editors, administrators, developers, and other people who work to create content for and help run Wikipedia.You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. attribution вЂ“ You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.to share вЂ“ to copy, distribute and transmit the work.This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Pricasso/ : * Jimmy Wales by Pricasso (cropped).jpg: Pricasso.This file was derived from: Jimmy Wales by Pricasso (cropped).jpg: Although the accusation is not COM:MELLOW, and very much in violation of no personal attacks, User:Russavia does not have an issue with this image being on Commons, because he finds it funny. English: A Demotivational poster which accuses User:Russavia of trolling for his part in the creation of File:Jimmy Wales by Pricasso (cropped).jpg.

Obvious troll is obvious